Tuesday, 8 March 2011

DVDs

DVD Production
Daniel Lennox



For this report I'm going to investigate the aspects of DVD production from a technical standpoint as well as a design and artistic view. I will explore both professional standards as well as what is available to the home user. I'm looking to get a further understanding of what types of DVD disks are out there and indeed what they are used for and why.

Technical analysis

There are many DVD disks to choose from when selecting to burn your footage onto something physical, which can be confusing at times. I will start with the most common DVD disk; DVD-R. DVD-R was the first recordable DVD disk that had the ability to be played on standalone DVD players. This was a major step in the home user creating things for themselves. DVD-R is a one write disk meaning that once it has been written onto, the space used on the disk is no longer available for use and cannot be deleted to make space for something else. This form of DVD is compatible with around 90% of all DVD players released to date according to my research and the majority of DVD-ROMs.

DVD-RW is the re-writeable disks of the same origin. These disks can be written onto multiples times and the data stored on them can be overwritten and replaced with something new. Unfortunately these disks are only compatible with around 80% of DVD players meaning they aren't quite as versatile as as their single write brothers. Both disks, single sided, have 4.37 GB computer space, but are both referred to as 4.7 GB disks. There is an option to get double sided disks in this format, meaning both sides of the disk can be written onto, this gives double the storage space, but no where to put disk art or any labelling.

DVD+R and DVD+RW are the main competitors in the DVD disk war. Both + and – have the same storage space and both can be bought in double sided formats, but DVD+R and DVD+RW are a little less compatible with DVD players, weighing in at just under 90% for +R and just under 80% for +RW, making –R and -RW slightly in the lead when it comes to which to select.

DVD-R and DVD+R can also come in a dual layered format, named DVD-R DL and DVD+R DL. This means that the one sided of the disks have more than one layer to them, increasing the amount of data they can hold from 4.37 to 7.95. This means it is slightly less that dual sided but you do get a spare side to put labelling and of course disk art.

There are a number of different writing speeds that are attributed to DVD disks, and with anything to do with computers, the higher the number, the better they perform. I've made a table below showing the writing speeds of disks available and the length of time it would take to fill these disks with data :-

x1
Around 58 minutes
x2
Around 29 minutes
x2.4
Around 24 minutes
x4
Around 14.5 minutes
x6
Around 10-12 minutes
x8
Around 8-10 minutes
x12
Around 6.5-7.5 minutes
x16
Around 6-7 minutes


These speeds refer to single layer DVD disks, Dual layer looks more like this :-

x1
Around 105 minutes
x2.4
Around 44 minutes
x4
Around 27 minutes


As you can see there is a slightly smaller range of speeds available for use, and even at the fastest, you still have to wait a considerably longer time to fill a disk compared to even mid range single layered disks.

So that's the sizes and speeds out the way, but what do we put onto these disks? Well there are differences with the Video and audio that can be put onto the disks, namely PAL and NTSC. These technical specifications have been taken from http://www.videohelp.com/dvd :-


PAL 

Video:

Up to 9.8 Mbps* (9800 kbps*) MPEG2 video
Up to 1.856 Mbps (1856 kbps) MPEG1 video
720 x 576 pixels MPEG2 (Called Full-D1)
704 x 576 pixels MPEG2
352 x 576 pixels MPEG2 (Called Half-D1, same as the CVD Standard)
352 x 288 pixels MPEG2
352 x 288 pixels MPEG1 (Same as the VCD Standard)
25 fps*
16:9 Anamorphic (only supported by 720x576)

Audio:
48000 Hz
32 - 1536 kbps
Up to 8 audio tracks containing Dolby Digital, DTS, PCM(uncompressed audio), MPEG-1 Layer2. One audio track must have MPEG-1, DD or PCM Audio.

Extras:
Motion menus, still pictures, up to 32 selectable subtitles, seamless branching for multiple storylines, 9 camera angles. And also additional DVD-ROM / data files that only can be read by computer DVD drives.

Total:
Total bitrate including video, audio and subs can be max 10.08 Mbps (10080 kbps)


* Mbps = million bits per second
* kbps = thousand bits per second 
* fps = frames per second 

For more technical DVD-Video details read the DVDDemystified DVD FAQ section 3.4
NTSC (NTSC Film)
Video:
Up to 9.8 Mbps* (9800 kbps*) MPEG2 video
Up to 1.856 Mbps (1856 kbps) MPEG1 video
720 x 480 pixels MPEG2 (Called Full-D1)
704 x 480 pixels MPEG2
352 x 480 pixels MPEG2 (Called Half-D1, same as the CVD Standard)
352 x 240 pixels MPEG2
352 x 240 pixels MPEG1 (Same as the VCD Standard)
29,97 fps*
23,976 fps with 3:2 pulldown = 29,97 playback fps (NTSC Film, this is only supported by MPEG2 video)
16:9 Anamorphic (only supported by 720x480)


Audio:
48000 Hz
32 - 1536 kbps
Up to 8 audio tracks containing DD (Dolby Digital/AC3), DTS, PCM(uncompressed audio), MPEG-1 Layer2. One audio track must have DD or PCM Audio.

Extras:
Motion menus, still pictures, up to 32 selectable subtitles, seamless branching for multiple storylines, 9 camera angles. And also additional DVD-ROM / data files that only can be read by computer DVD drives.

Total:
Total bitrate including video, audio and subs can be max 10.08 Mbps (10080 kbps) 


As we can see there are differences with the video output of these DVD video formats, mainly in the Resolution of the final video output and the frame rate that they play at. We can also see that the only video that can be used on a DVD is that of MPEG1 and MPEG2, with MPEG2 being the better of the 2. Both NTSC and PAL use 48000 Hz with up to 8 audio tracks at 32 – 1536 kbps, meaning the audio from one format of DVD would be exactly the same if the video was changed. For more information on the Technical specifications of DVD disks, visit :-

Authoring

The range of authoring software is mind boggling to comprehend, from the simplest home user software to the most technical of the industry professionals. I'll go through a couple that I have had contact with to give you a picture of what they are all about.

Ill start with the basic home user solution known as Nero. (http://www.nero.com/eng/nero-burning-rom-overview.html) Nero is a bundle software system that sometimes comes free with computer components when bought. Its a basic tool that can be used to create very simple menus, labelling and other aspects of DVD creation. The limitations on this program means it cant really be viable for professional use. Its a basic drag and drop system that doesn't really give you the option to set your own menus and design exactly what you want on your disk. It has multiple options for Copying Ripping and burning DVD, CD and Blu-Ray disks. It does support the import of Light scribe disks and labelling, although doesn't really give that much more in the way of labelling. The simplicity of this program means that I personally wouldn't use it when it came to creating a custom DVD of something that I wanted to show someone, but is useful for quick and easy burning or copying of anything that isn't really that important or official.

Adobe software has a little more professionalism to it when it comes to authoring DVDs. With their product Encore, you can have custom made menus created in their other piece of software, photoshop. Not only this you can have animated menus and even multiple layered menus stemming from the first. There is no limit to the creativity you can achieve when creating DVD menus with this program. But it doesn't just blow Nero out of the water with menu design. It also incorporates things that we as consumers take as standard these days in the way of subtitles and bonus content such as director commentaries and other things that don't come as standard. Encore is a big step ion the way of professionalism for DVD authoring but it by no means the industry standard that is used.

These two pieces of software are a very small look into what can be used to author encode and burn DVD disks. But with the software, you need the hardware to go with it. There are a number of burners available to use. The whole range can be found by simple searching for DVD burning drives in a search engine or a computer component website. Ebuyer, a website I have used in the past, has a wide range of drives that can be used to burn DVD and Blu-Ray content.


Codes and conventions of existing DVD menus

I'm going to deconstruct a couple of existing menus on some big DVD releases to see if I can identify the codes and conventions within DVD menu releases. Ill start with :-

Gladiator Disk 1

Front Menu options

Play Movie             Scene Selections
Subtitles                  Languages/Audio setup

Visuals

As the menu starts there is a short showreel type preview of the film before the buttons show. As the preview ends there is a view from the top of the Colosseum, created using visual effects and 3d imaging. There is also a montage of close-up shots of the main characters in the film to get s sense of what the film is about and the feel of the film. I think it works well and is very effective in making the user ready to take what is about to be shown. The whole thing has a very dark and gloomy colour scheme.

Sound

Throughout the entirety of the menu there is music playing that is taken directly from the soundtrack. This works well with the menu in again making a certain feel about it. With the option of audio setup you can choose between English, 5.1 Dolby English and audio commentary from the director, the DOP and editor.

Conclusion

The producers of the disk have decided to bring all of these aspects together to make a menu that fits perfectly with the subject matter of the feature in mind, they have made sure that the menu is that of the same theme and is very friendly to the novice user.

Saving Private Ryan

Saving Private Ryan starts a little bit different from the other DVD mentioned when first inserted in a way that it does not actually bring you to the menu screen on first insertion. Instead the producers of the DVD have decided to make it go straight into the feature. This may be to put more focus on the actual film and take it away from any flashy effects that would take attention away from the feature. Once we get to the actual menu the layout is very similar with the options along the bottom.

Front Menu Options                                     

                                      Play Movie    Scene Index    Special features    Subtitles

As we can see there is no audio settings option on the main screen, instead being replaced with a Special feature option. The lack of the special features option can be explained in the first example, in that it was a dual disk production, meaning all of the special features were put onto that second disk. This however doesn't excuse the fact that this second example has no options for the audio.

Visuals

As with the first example the options are on the bottom and there is footage from the film being played above. This again goes with the feel behind the film and what it is trying to achieve.

Sound

As with the first example this again as music taken directly from the soundtrack, making the consumer feel a certain way about the whole experience. What is different though is that there are sound effects added into the menu along with the music, the sounds of WWII bombs exploding in the distance really give a feeling of being there in the war zone before we actually watch the film itself.

Conclusion

The producers of this disk have put a lot of effort into the sound and feel of this disk while trying to keep it as simplistic as possible to make sure the majority of the attention goes onto the actual film and there are no distractions from it. I feel they have done well in making a very usable interface along with keeping everything relevant.


Conclusion

Looking back at the development of disks over the time of their existence, it would seem only right to give them a bright prediction for the future. But with the internet and digital distribution being in fashion these days without any foreseeable ending, it may be a dying form of media. In the next few years I can see the internet taking over from physical productions on disks. As with any source of media, from the days of Betamax moving to VHS and indeed VHS moving to DVD, the change has always come along and it has always taken total control over what has been around previously. The only thing I can see for the future of disk based media is that of nostalgia, and wanting to own something physical without just knowing you have it online on an account, swimming in an endless sea of zeros and ones. It will be an interesting few years ahead of us in terms of development and distribution, and I myself am looking forward to what the future brings.

Thursday, 4 November 2010

The Current uses of Motion Graphics and Visual Effects

You cant watch a single thing these days without having your eyes bombarded with motion graphics and visual effects. It can be seen in simple panel shows to major blockbusters and literally anything in between. But why is is so popular? I mean, what is it that keeps people on it? Well there's a few things that make it what it is, but to find this out we have to go back to the start; back to where it all began.

The very start of the term motion graphics is disputed in a way that some see it stretching as far back as the 1800s, but the term could very have been coined when John Whitney founded the company Motion Graphics Inc. The most significant pioneer of course could be argued to be Saul Bass with his work on the title sequences on films such as Vertigo
Psycho (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tek8QmKRODw)
and North by Northwest (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAmem5wVOUU)

Of course this isn't what is modernly known as motion graphics. It never really took on until the introduction of computer generated motion graphics.

At this time computers were still very expensive and hard to use. Motion graphics was still on the rise though and continued to bloom out of control. The draw of course being that it was a lot easier to create a very flashy expensive looking sequence without actually spending that much in TV and film terms. Visual effects also took off with the integration of compositing video. Anything that would be too dangerous of costly or simply impractical could be digitally created to look real.

In today's modern productions there are countless examples of motion graphics and visual effects filling our screens. Simple panel shows like Mock the week have a very flashy yet relevant title sequence. These visuals mixed with the very catchy music into make the brand instantly recognisable.

Visual effects can also be seen a lot on our screens, and not just from obvious examples like the huge blockbuster Avatar. The simple televised drama John Adams, centred around the birth of the United states is heavy in its visual effects (http://www.wimp.com/youcan/). Visual effects can be seen in all kinds of places. There isnt a modern day DVD title released without a flashy interface made for pure eye candy for the consumer. There is alot of work goes into every aspect of motion graphics with a multitude of layers taking all kinds of twists and turns.

There are of course alot of technical issues involved with making these flashy animated things. There is the fraerate to consider, get the wrong and it just wouldnt look right. Which could be a problem when making animations and motion graphics for overseas. In the Uk we use the PAL format with its 25 frames per second, whereas in america NTSC is the main output, with its frame rate weighing in at 29.97. As well as this, with the boom of HD (High Definition) productions, creating believeable visual effects has never been harder to do. Resolution plays a massive part, making things look out of focus the whole time or just plain wrong. This means everything takes alot longer to work with, with computers only just being able to keep up with the demand of quality. Sending these files around can also be an issue slowing production. With the high quality comes high filesize, which means the correct compression is vital in creating the best quality with the smallest possible file size.


So we know what they are used on but what we don't know yet is how they are produced. Well there are a multitude of software packages that can create amazing results in the right hands. For motion graphics, especially for animations and other simple things we could use the widespread Flash software from adobe. This is pretty easy to get your hands on and pretty easy to use. This of course is very basic, and designed for the home user and of course for websites and other online content. For the more professional user there is of course the major player, and most likely the most used in the industry. I am course talking about the huge After effects. This is a very powerful program that can be used by anyone who afford it. The majority of the visual effects and motion graphics on TV and film, you could safely bet, has been produced using this program. This is to say this isn't the only software used. For the mac user there is Final cut pro, another huge program that is used with video editing.

If you can get yourself really good at using these kinds of software you can actually make a good living in this field. There is a few companies that you can work for, there is never too many people working on these kinds of productions because of how widespread it is used. There is a multitude of jobs available in this field, too many to list, but here's the link for you to check it out (http://motionographer.com/jobs/).

So there you are, a small insight into the world of visual effects and motion graphics. There is a huge demand for motion graphics or visual effects. If you are thinking about getting into this kind of profession then I suggest getting some training first. There is a lot of help online in the form of tutorials. If you are wanting to get some training I suggest the great guys at http://www.videocopilot.net/ for some top notch turtorials.